In our reading of Emerging Technologies in E-Learning by Delich, Kelley, and McIntosh, we are given a brief history on the evolution of the web, a tour of popular e-learning technologies being used today, an examination on how those technologies are being used in our daily lives, and a brief glimpse into the future of e-learning. This was a great introduction to the world of Web 2.0 since it gave a broad snapshot of what was being used today with all of the relevant links and glossary definitions to explore and refer to.
The article describes social computing as being the essence of Web 2.0, with that not only does the author of the message or information has a voice but so does the participant or learner -- that potentially doubles the amount or more of sources to explore through. There is no doubt that by having someone to participate in the discussion brings out more critical thinking than a one way version but I sometimes wonder if it is necessarily more effective if we have to spend time and energy in sorting through long threads of irrelevant content. Sometimes I waste time in sorting through responses in blogs and forums that just say things like "That was cool" or "I know how you feel" or "That's true". It's great that the responses show an enthusiastic audience but it holds very little or no value in getting more out of the content being discussed.
In reference to artificial intelligence of computers such as those depicted in science fiction, maybe some sort of brain can be implemented to sort and maybe delete or put aside the irrelevant information so that a visitor to the site can explore and get right into the relevant material. However, I am afraid that has a possibility of increasing a type of fear also often portrayed in science fiction and that is the fear of computers taking control of humans.
Honoring Dr. Kim Foreman
15 years ago